<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let the main stream inspire us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/let-the-main-stream-inspire-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/let-the-main-stream-inspire-us/</link>
	<description>Digital advertising, Mobile/portable, (r)etail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:38:29 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: helgetenno</title>
		<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/let-the-main-stream-inspire-us/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>helgetenno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.180360720.no/?p=652#comment-922</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t shower in hot or cold water, It&#039;s usually something in the middle.

You make a valid point of course. The format of blogging isn&#039;t very giving when it comes to nuance, and opinions often come across promoting one view and leaving out others, even it is not intended.

And, nice job with Clacy :o) He is good..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t shower in hot or cold water, It&#8217;s usually something in the middle.</p>
<p>You make a valid point of course. The format of blogging isn&#8217;t very giving when it comes to nuance, and opinions often come across promoting one view and leaving out others, even it is not intended.</p>
<p>And, nice job with Clacy :o) He is good..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O.S</title>
		<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/let-the-main-stream-inspire-us/comment-page-1/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>O.S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.180360720.no/?p=652#comment-921</guid>
		<description>Who the h**l is Clacy??? Haha, Shirky of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who the h**l is Clacy??? Haha, Shirky of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O.S</title>
		<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/let-the-main-stream-inspire-us/comment-page-1/#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>O.S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.180360720.no/?p=652#comment-920</guid>
		<description>Without having seen the video yet, I just have to comment because I react to the typical either/or classification that often prevails, and persists. I mean in my mind digital is the only media/channel/whatever  term, that can be both. And it can be it simultaniously. BBC broadcasts live to the whole world - mass media, direct twitter - one to one, blogging about your interests - my media. It&#039;s everything, and that&#039;s more awesome that anything before. Twitter is good for example because it allows the users to decide, as in open tweets or direct ones. Whatever makes more sense decides. And like Clacy said; it doesn&#039;t become really useful until it gets booring, or something like that, which makes a lot of sence. The mainstream are still MySpace and MSN and those services aren&#039;t fully developed yet, so disregarding services like them would be a mistake. Anyone else reacting to the either/or thinking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without having seen the video yet, I just have to comment because I react to the typical either/or classification that often prevails, and persists. I mean in my mind digital is the only media/channel/whatever  term, that can be both. And it can be it simultaniously. BBC broadcasts live to the whole world &#8211; mass media, direct twitter &#8211; one to one, blogging about your interests &#8211; my media. It&#8217;s everything, and that&#8217;s more awesome that anything before. Twitter is good for example because it allows the users to decide, as in open tweets or direct ones. Whatever makes more sense decides. And like Clacy said; it doesn&#8217;t become really useful until it gets booring, or something like that, which makes a lot of sence. The mainstream are still MySpace and MSN and those services aren&#8217;t fully developed yet, so disregarding services like them would be a mistake. Anyone else reacting to the either/or thinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
