<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The product relationship and the marketing relationship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/the-product-relationship-and-the-marketing-relationship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/the-product-relationship-and-the-marketing-relationship/</link>
	<description>Digital advertising, Mobile/portable, (r)etail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 16:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: helgetenno</title>
		<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/the-product-relationship-and-the-marketing-relationship/comment-page-1/#comment-1724</link>
		<dc:creator>helgetenno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.180360720.no/?p=2717#comment-1724</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike, thanks for your comment. :)

Ludwig, if I understand you correctly you would be saying that the marketing is more important then the product as it will most likely outlive it (as the brand does today)? Which would be a good incentive to turn the marketing into tangible value instead of just messaging. I agree :)

Helge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike, thanks for your comment. :)</p>
<p>Ludwig, if I understand you correctly you would be saying that the marketing is more important then the product as it will most likely outlive it (as the brand does today)? Which would be a good incentive to turn the marketing into tangible value instead of just messaging. I agree :)</p>
<p>Helge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ludwig Jonsson</title>
		<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/the-product-relationship-and-the-marketing-relationship/comment-page-1/#comment-1720</link>
		<dc:creator>Ludwig Jonsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.180360720.no/?p=2717#comment-1720</guid>
		<description>I totally agree and dig your thoughts.

However, I do believe focus shouldn&#039;t lay on the product itself. I rather think we should consider what need we are fulfilling as the god. Because in the end, the product is just the temporary partner satisfying our needs. 

Do you agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree and dig your thoughts.</p>
<p>However, I do believe focus shouldn&#8217;t lay on the product itself. I rather think we should consider what need we are fulfilling as the god. Because in the end, the product is just the temporary partner satisfying our needs. </p>
<p>Do you agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Looney</title>
		<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/the-product-relationship-and-the-marketing-relationship/comment-page-1/#comment-1629</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Looney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.180360720.no/?p=2717#comment-1629</guid>
		<description>Precisely. And a bicycle (pictured) is a great example. I think of all the places my bike takes me. How many stories it could tell. The fact that it&#039;s a Trek is an afterthought. 

Good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Precisely. And a bicycle (pictured) is a great example. I think of all the places my bike takes me. How many stories it could tell. The fact that it&#8217;s a Trek is an afterthought. </p>
<p>Good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

