<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is next generation participation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/what-is-next-generation-participation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/what-is-next-generation-participation/</link>
	<description>Digital advertising, Mobile/portable, (r)etail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 16:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Next Generation Marketing &#124; PSFK - Trends, Ideas &#38; Inspiration</title>
		<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/what-is-next-generation-participation/comment-page-1/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Next Generation Marketing &#124; PSFK - Trends, Ideas &#38; Inspiration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.180360720.no/?p=521#comment-783</guid>
		<description>[...] can see the full presentation in the slideshow above. [180360720 via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can see the full presentation in the slideshow above. [180360720 via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/what-is-next-generation-participation/comment-page-1/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.180360720.no/?p=521#comment-782</guid>
		<description>Thanks for contributing O.S. 
I do agree with you. I think it aligns with the thoughts of both Clay Shirky and Charles Leadbeater.

Leadbeater voices his opinion on the problems of patent regulation, and how it fits the old - but not the new way of business in his speech at TED some years ago.
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/charles_leadbeater_on_innovation.html

Seth Godins book Meatball Sundae actually also puts the point across - new media is for new business models, not old. :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for contributing O.S.<br />
I do agree with you. I think it aligns with the thoughts of both Clay Shirky and Charles Leadbeater.</p>
<p>Leadbeater voices his opinion on the problems of patent regulation, and how it fits the old &#8211; but not the new way of business in his speech at TED some years ago.<br />
<a href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/charles_leadbeater_on_innovation.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/charles_leadbeater_on_innovation.html</a></p>
<p>Seth Godins book Meatball Sundae actually also puts the point across &#8211; new media is for new business models, not old. :o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O.S</title>
		<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/what-is-next-generation-participation/comment-page-1/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>O.S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.180360720.no/?p=521#comment-780</guid>
		<description>well one of the tricky things has to do with old models and old ways of companies. Owning stuff, and creating standards. We can&#039;t even seem to build browsers that interpret code (when correctly written) the same way. This is, of course, a must. Standards that leaves everything enterpretable and open. When the sharing mentality of proactive (dare I say younger) people is the ruling way of thinking, we&#039;ll get near. However much I agree with you, there are so many obstacles - and they&#039;re not technologically based. It&#039;s rather collective company thinking (old truths).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well one of the tricky things has to do with old models and old ways of companies. Owning stuff, and creating standards. We can&#8217;t even seem to build browsers that interpret code (when correctly written) the same way. This is, of course, a must. Standards that leaves everything enterpretable and open. When the sharing mentality of proactive (dare I say younger) people is the ruling way of thinking, we&#8217;ll get near. However much I agree with you, there are so many obstacles &#8211; and they&#8217;re not technologically based. It&#8217;s rather collective company thinking (old truths).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

