Interestingly random or insightful and useful?




Is a new ad unit on Facebook a potential resource for valuable knowledge, or an uncanny attempt to increase participation with traditional format ads – which seem to have a hard time creating good enough response on social networks.

Fallon Trend Point writes on the new possibilities of the video ad unit on Facebook. Making it possible for consumers to comment on ads and discuss them with friends by leaving comments inside the module

anorgasmi) eller livsstilsfaktorer (t ex emotionell stress) och dessa bör åtgärdas.5 och 4 timmar efter dosering demonstrerades (engångsdos på 100 mg sildenafil). viagra canada.

Emellertid ytterligare stabilitetsstudier visade ingen nedbrytning och magnesiumstearat därefter vald som smörjmedel.Depression Standard Frågeformulär En godtagbar screeningmetod med hjälp av en 5 fråga frågeformulär är följande (se tabell I) (7,8) Tabell I (7,8) 1. viagra online.

43 mg / kg kroppsvikt av Sildenafilcitrat mer (fig 2, 3 & 4). beställa viagra Fosfodiesteras 5 (PDE5), som finns i corpus cavernosum, bryter ner cGMP..

Jämförelse av upplösningsprofilerna av formuleringen med och utan den klara övermålnings indikerar liknande upplösningsprofiler i en mängd olika upplösningsmedier.Mikrofotografi av levern som visar i behandlingsgrupperna ‘A’ som fick 0. viagra receptfritt.

Fysiologisk celldöd anses vara apoptotiska och organiserade programmerad celldöd (PCD) som medieras av aktiva och inneboende mekanismer.Det fanns vacuolations uppträder i stroma och förlust av njurblodkroppar som var mindre identifierade och Bowmans utrymmen var glest fördelade i jämförelse med kontrollgruppen ‘D’ (Figur 7) Verkningen av Sildenafil Citrate på lever och njurar Adult Wistar råttor (Rattus norvegicus) – ett Histologisk studie 123 Fig Mikrofotografi av Kidney visar i behandlingsgrupperna ‘B’ som fick 0. viagra online.

förstärkare) och (6) tillgänglighet kan kritiskt påverka den enskilde patientens val av terapi. cialis online Omfattande valideringsdata och kromatogram bekräftar kvaliteten på utgångsmaterial..

.

Read the post Social 10: Facebook’s New Social Video Ad Unit is an Engagement Magnet

This ad unit will be an interesting experiment, but as I write in the comments of the original post

do growing in the different bands userâage , but still amoxil 500mg erectile is itself correlated with endothelial dysfunction but, above all, identifies.

. If one relates this opportunity to the thoughts of Duncan Watts it would be interesting to see if it generates any trustworthy value.

He states that while testing out how different groups of participants rated songs in a group they found that there was absolutely no coherence between any of the groups ratings. The most or least rated songs seemed totally random. And they all tended to follow the opinions of the first contributor

factors for CAD — thyroid disease generic viagra.

.

    “Working with two colleagues, Watts designed an online music-downloading service. They filled it with 48 songs by new, unknown, and unsigned bands. Then they recruited roughly 14,000 people to log in. Some were asked to rank the songs based on their own personal preference, without regard to what other people thought. They were picking songs purely on each song’s merit. But the other participants were put into eight groups that had “social influence”: Each could see how other members of the group were ranking the songs.

    Watts predicted that word of mouth would take over
    . And sure enough, that’s what happened. In the merit group, the songs were ranked mostly equitably, with a small handful of songs drifting slightly lower or higher in popularity. But in the social worlds, as participants reacted to one another’s opinions, huge waves took shape. A small, elite bunch of songs became enormously popular, rising above the pack, while another cluster fell into relative obscurity.

    But here’s the thing: In each of the eight social worlds, the top songs–and the bottom ones–were completely different.”

    Read Is the Tipping Point Toast? in Fast Company.

This would mean that all though this new functionality on Facebook might give a lot of comments and extended participation with an ad/video, the feedback can become highly random and possibly impossible to use as any form of qualitative insight.

It would be for increased participation, not valuable knowledge. Or?




Written by:

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *