<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REAL value AS it is happening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/real-value-as-it-is-happening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/real-value-as-it-is-happening/</link>
	<description>Digital advertising, Mobile/portable, (r)etail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 16:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: helgetenno</title>
		<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/real-value-as-it-is-happening/comment-page-1/#comment-1265</link>
		<dc:creator>helgetenno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.180360720.no/?p=1956#comment-1265</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris, thanks for your contribution and very nice references :o). Sorry for the late reply.

In my mind, if we want to understand what people think about a product we can still benefit from listening to peoples thoughts and actions as they are experiencing it.

Just listening to peoples own articulation of an experience - based on our questions, or having them rate OUR suggested articulations of how it could have been experienced, consists of so many weaknesses that it gives quite an unfair and/or incorrect depiction of how the experience actually was felt. 

The weakness doesn&#039;t necessarily come from the &quot;when&quot; aspect of the question. Rather relying on peoples ability to correctly state their opinions as opposed to recording what they actually say or feel.

It&#039;s the recording LIVE thing that will give us a much richer and more correct picture of their preferences, rather than their perception of it later on.

Thanks again for sharing your thoughts.

Best :o)
Helge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris, thanks for your contribution and very nice references :o). Sorry for the late reply.</p>
<p>In my mind, if we want to understand what people think about a product we can still benefit from listening to peoples thoughts and actions as they are experiencing it.</p>
<p>Just listening to peoples own articulation of an experience &#8211; based on our questions, or having them rate OUR suggested articulations of how it could have been experienced, consists of so many weaknesses that it gives quite an unfair and/or incorrect depiction of how the experience actually was felt. </p>
<p>The weakness doesn&#8217;t necessarily come from the &#8220;when&#8221; aspect of the question. Rather relying on peoples ability to correctly state their opinions as opposed to recording what they actually say or feel.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the recording LIVE thing that will give us a much richer and more correct picture of their preferences, rather than their perception of it later on.</p>
<p>Thanks again for sharing your thoughts.</p>
<p>Best :o)<br />
Helge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Allison</title>
		<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/real-value-as-it-is-happening/comment-page-1/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.180360720.no/?p=1956#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>I think what&#039;s crucial here is the distinction between designing and selling, or as Seth Godin put it: the difference between marketing and advertising. If we&#039;re going to be close to the creation process and influence how products are designed and what problems are customers are looking to solve then we need to understand the moment of experience. If we are looking to sell a product that has already been made then we should be more worried about what people think about the product now [that they&#039;ve already used it and the experience is in the past].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what&#8217;s crucial here is the distinction between designing and selling, or as Seth Godin put it: the difference between marketing and advertising. If we&#8217;re going to be close to the creation process and influence how products are designed and what problems are customers are looking to solve then we need to understand the moment of experience. If we are looking to sell a product that has already been made then we should be more worried about what people think about the product now [that they've already used it and the experience is in the past].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helgetenno</title>
		<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/real-value-as-it-is-happening/comment-page-1/#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator>helgetenno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.180360720.no/?p=1956#comment-1263</guid>
		<description>Hi Simon, thanks for your question, it is one I have been pondering about myself as well. :o)

My take on it is that if we are to improve a service, we need to understand how the activity is actually experienced when it is experienced. 

If we are to ask people after driving a car or doing a jog how they drove or how they ran the feedback is going to be without details and distorted by the perception of how they thought this experience was going to be in the first place. Which means that the insight we gather in order to design a better experience is both lacking important information at the same time as it might be completely wrong.

If our only goal is to manipulate the perception of an experience I completely agree with you, but if we are to design the experience itself we need to know what is actually going on at the moment of exposure.

Thanks again for your question, I hope the feedback was satisfying?

Best Regards
Helge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Simon, thanks for your question, it is one I have been pondering about myself as well. :o)</p>
<p>My take on it is that if we are to improve a service, we need to understand how the activity is actually experienced when it is experienced. </p>
<p>If we are to ask people after driving a car or doing a jog how they drove or how they ran the feedback is going to be without details and distorted by the perception of how they thought this experience was going to be in the first place. Which means that the insight we gather in order to design a better experience is both lacking important information at the same time as it might be completely wrong.</p>
<p>If our only goal is to manipulate the perception of an experience I completely agree with you, but if we are to design the experience itself we need to know what is actually going on at the moment of exposure.</p>
<p>Thanks again for your question, I hope the feedback was satisfying?</p>
<p>Best Regards<br />
Helge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.180360720.no/index.php/archive/real-value-as-it-is-happening/comment-page-1/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.180360720.no/?p=1956#comment-1262</guid>
		<description>Hi Helge

Surely knowing that &quot;People tend to remember events as they imagined them to be&quot; is good in itself? People rarely take action at the point of exposure. Wouldn&#039;t knowing what people consistently recall, and figuring out how to influence that, be more valuable than that transient, fleeting moment?

However, I&#039;m not disputing that real-time data is also a) interesting and b) useful

Cheers
Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Helge</p>
<p>Surely knowing that &#8220;People tend to remember events as they imagined them to be&#8221; is good in itself? People rarely take action at the point of exposure. Wouldn&#8217;t knowing what people consistently recall, and figuring out how to influence that, be more valuable than that transient, fleeting moment?</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m not disputing that real-time data is also a) interesting and b) useful</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

